Seventy percent of COIs received by transportation companies are non-compliant at first submission. That number comes from direct industry experience - and it means the average carrier compliance program is passing through defective certificates at a high rate.
Most of these failures aren't the result of carriers carrying inadequate insurance. They're the result of compliance programs that don't catch the gaps. Here are the seven most common mistakes - and what each one costs when it matters.
Mistake 1: Treating COI Collection as COI Compliance
Carrier COI Compliance Gaps
This is the foundational error from which every other mistake flows. A COI is evidence that a policy existed at the time the certificate was printed. It is not a guarantee that the carrier's coverage meets your contract requirements.
A shipper that collects COIs from 500 carriers and files them in a shared drive has a document management system - not a compliance program. The difference becomes apparent the first time a claim surfaces and coverage is disputed.
The fix: Every COI must be compared against the specific contract or agreement governing the carrier relationship. Coverage types, limits, endorsements, and named insured language must be verified against what your contract requires - not against a generic standard.
Mistake 2: Accepting COIs Directly from Carriers
COI fraud is real and growing in trucking. Carriers have submitted certificates with altered limits, fabricated insurer names, and extended expiration dates. In most cases, these forgeries are detectable - but only if the COI is requested from the issuing agent or insurer, not from the carrier.
A brokerage that allows carriers to self-submit COIs via email is relying on the carrier's honesty as its primary verification control. That is not a control.
The fix: Request COIs directly from the carrier's insurance agent or broker. For high-risk or high-value relationships, verify policy details with the insurer directly. Do not accept carrier-submitted COIs without independent confirmation.
Mistake 3: Missing Endorsement Verification
The ACORD 25 certificate form has limited space and limited detail. Endorsements - additional insured, waiver of subrogation, MCS-90, hired/non-owned auto - are often referenced in the description-of-operations field but are not guaranteed by that reference.
A description that says "Additional Insured: ABC Logistics" on the certificate does not mean the endorsement is actually attached to the policy. Insurers can issue COIs that reference endorsements that were never formally added. The certificate holder discovers this at claim time.
The fix: For every required endorsement, call the agent and request confirmation that the endorsement is attached to the policy - not just referenced on the certificate. For critical endorsements (additional insured, waiver of subrogation), request a copy of the endorsement form itself.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Cargo Policy Exclusions
Cargo policies are not blanket coverage. They routinely exclude specific commodity types, and these exclusions don't appear on the face of the ACORD 25. Common exclusions include:
- Electronics and high-value goods (per-item sub-limits often apply)
- Temperature-sensitive goods (refrigeration breakdown excluded unless endorsed)
- Pharmaceuticals and medical devices
- Alcohol and tobacco (high theft risk)
- Household goods shipped with unpackaged items
A shipper of electronics discovers after a $180,000 cargo theft that the carrier's cargo policy had a $25,000 per-item sub-limit that applied to electronics. The COI showed a $100,000 limit. Nobody asked about exclusions.
The fix: For commodity-specific freight, request the cargo policy declarations page and review exclusions and sub-limits. Do not assume the face limit on the COI applies uniformly to your freight.
Mistake 5: Letting Policies Expire Without a Renewal Process
Most carrier policies renew annually. Without a proactive renewal tracking system, COIs expire silently - and carriers continue hauling freight under lapsed coverage without anyone noticing until a claim occurs.
The average transportation compliance team has no systematic process for advance renewal requests. They react when a COI expires, rather than requesting renewals 60-90 days in advance.
The fix: Build a renewal calendar into your compliance workflow. Set 60-day advance alerts for every carrier certificate. Send renewal requests to the carrier and their agent simultaneously. Do not allow freight to move on an expired COI - even by one day.
Mistake 6: Not Verifying Named Insured Against the Contracting Entity
The carrier you've contracted with may not be the same legal entity named on the COI. Common mismatches:
- The carrier operates under a DBA name but the policy names the legal LLC
- A subsidiary operates under a parent company's policy (which may not cover the subsidiary)
- An owner-operator is listed by personal name, not the business entity in the contract
If the named insured on the policy is not the entity that signed your broker-carrier agreement, the policy may not respond to a claim arising from that carrier's operations.
The fix: Confirm the named insured on every COI matches the exact legal entity in your contract. If there's any discrepancy, require documentation from the insurer confirming coverage extends to the contracting entity.
Mistake 7: Using One Standard Checklist for All Carrier Types
A freight broker applying the same COI checklist to asset carriers, owner-operators, freight brokers, and 3PLs will systematically miss coverage requirements specific to each type. The coverage structure is materially different:
- Owner-operators need bobtail/NTL coverage that asset carriers don't
- Freight brokers carry contingent cargo, not direct cargo
- 3PLs may carry warehouseman's legal liability and professional liability that aren't relevant to asset carriers
A checklist built for asset carriers applied to an owner-operator will miss the bobtail policy entirely. Applied to a freight broker, it will flag an absence of cargo coverage that's expected by design (broker carries contingent).
The fix: Develop carrier-type-specific compliance profiles. Your compliance review for an owner-operator should look different from the review for an asset carrier, which should look different from the review for a freight broker.
The Compounding Cost of These Mistakes
Fix Your Compliance Program
Each of these mistakes, in isolation, represents a manageable risk. Together, across a carrier network of 200-1,000 carriers, they create systemic exposure. The average uninsured or underinsured incident in transportation exceeds $500,000 in direct and legal costs. The average cost of a robust compliance program is a fraction of that.
The math is not subtle: catching one coverage gap that would have resulted in a claim pays for years of compliance investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I know if my current COI review process is catching these mistakes? Audit a random sample of 20-30 current carrier COIs against your broker-carrier agreements - checking every coverage type, limit, and endorsement against the contract. If you find gaps in more than 30% of the sample, your process is missing material compliance failures.
What's the most common gap found during COI audits? In transportation, the most common gap is either an auto liability limit below the contract minimum (often $750K vs. $1M required) or a missing or unverified additional insured endorsement.
Can I fix these problems without compliance software? Yes - with enough staff time and rigorous process. But at scale (100+ carriers), the volume and error rate of manual review make technology a necessity. The question is not whether to automate, but when.
What documentation should I have on file to demonstrate compliance due diligence? At minimum: the COI as received, your comparison against the contract requirements, the date of review, who conducted the review, and any remediation steps taken. If a claim occurs, this documentation is your defense.
These mistakes are common because COI compliance is genuinely hard to do well at scale without the right tools. But they are preventable - and the cost of prevention is always less than the cost of a claim.
See how Bramble catches all 7 of these mistakes automatically or learn how contract vs. COI comparison works.
Stop making preventable mistakes. Book a demo at getbramble.com and see how clause-level comparison works in real time.